In a report based on the study results, authors Li-Kai Chen, Emma Dorn, Jimmy Sarakatsannis, and Anna Wiesinger detail how instructors think remote knowing has affected trainee learning.

Most current posts by Laura Ascione
( see all).

Laura Ascione is the Editorial Director, Content Services at eSchool Media. She is a graduate of the University of Marylands prominent Philip Merrill College of Journalism.

The survey, which details learning loss on an international level, asked instructors in eight countries to rate how efficient remote knowing was when it initially began– the typical score was 5 out of 10, however its worth noting that teachers in Japan and the U.S. doled out lower grades, with almost 60 percent score remote knowing between a 1 and a 3 out of 10.

While numerous educators found ingenious and distinct methods to provide remote and interesting guideline to their trainees, the bulk of teachers responding to a McKinsey study said virtual knowing over the past year is “a poor substitute” for in-person learning.

The authors surveyed instructors in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States between late October and early November of 2020.